Review



sdf1-α (cxcl12)  (PeproTech)


Bioz Verified Symbol PeproTech is a verified supplier  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 90

    Structured Review

    PeproTech sdf1-α (cxcl12)
    Sdf1 α (Cxcl12), supplied by PeproTech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/sdf1-%CE%B1+%28cxcl12%29/pmc10019826-201-72-74?v=PeproTech
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    sdf1-α (cxcl12) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    90/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    95
    R&D Systems sdf1 α
    Sdf1 α, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/sdf1-%CE%B1+%28cxcl12%29/pm37114312-52-11-12?v=R%26D+Systems
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    sdf1 α - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    PeproTech sdf1-α (cxcl12)
    Sdf1 α (Cxcl12), supplied by PeproTech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/sdf1-%CE%B1+%28cxcl12%29/pmc10019826-201-72-74?v=PeproTech
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    sdf1-α (cxcl12) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    PeproTech cxcl12 (recombinant human sdf1-α)
    Cxcl12 (Recombinant Human Sdf1 α), supplied by PeproTech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/sdf1-%CE%B1+%28cxcl12%29/pm34095108-34-0-7?v=PeproTech
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    cxcl12 (recombinant human sdf1-α) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    PeproTech human recombinant sdf1 α (cxcl12)
    Human Recombinant Sdf1 α (Cxcl12), supplied by PeproTech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/sdf1-%CE%B1+%28cxcl12%29/pm31852686-316-0-8?v=PeproTech
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    human recombinant sdf1 α (cxcl12) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    PeproTech sdf1-α (cxcl12
    Sdf1 α (Cxcl12, supplied by PeproTech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/sdf1-%CE%B1+%28cxcl12%29/bio_rxiv__742676-196-43-45?v=PeproTech
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    sdf1-α (cxcl12 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Thermo Fisher recombinant human cxcl12 (sdf1 α
    CRISPR-Cas9 mediated knock-in at the CXCR4 C-terminus results in endogenously labelled protein which localises to the membrane and endosomes. (A) Staining of CXCR4 with KO validated and Fusin antibodies results in poor labelling of the receptor protein, while mEGFP and HaloTag knock-in cells demonstrate a membrane specific localisation. Interestingly mEos 4b CO clones demonstrate fluorescent aggregates, suggesting the fluorophore is cleaved. (B) mEGFP and HaloTag knock-in samples provide clonal populations which are evenly labelled and offer large samples for imaging experiments. (C) Measurement of total CXCR4 expression in wild type versus CRISPR edited cells through qRT-PCR. Compared to wild type, mEGFP knock-ins demonstrate an approximately 20-fold increase in expression (* p = 0.0384). Conversely, HaloTag knock-ins demonstrate a 50% reduction in expression (* p = 0.0301), while mEos 4b CO knock-in shows no change. (D) When RT PCR is performed using tag specific primers, the significant increase in mEGFP expression is likely due to the stability of mEGFP tagged CXCR4 RNA, suggesting that RNA stability is likely a factor in mediating the tag specific down-regulation observed. (E) <t>CXCL12-mediated</t> g protein activation measured by observing G protein dissociation/conformational changes by BRET in knock-in or wildtype cells transfected with cDNA encoding G α i1/Nluc and Venus/G γ 2. Results are expressed as % maximal <t>CXCL12</t> response observed in wildtype cells andshow a 3 fold increase in response in mEGFP knock-in clones compared to wild type, with a 50% reduction in response in HaloTag knock-in, and no variation in mEos 4b CO clones. (F) Potency of CXCL12-mediated g protein activation in cells expressing wildtype or gene-edited CXCR4.( n = 3 (S.D) for qRT-PCR data, compared by One-Way ANOVA with multiple comparisons. n = 5 for functional data.)
    Recombinant Human Cxcl12 (Sdf1 α, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/sdf1-%CE%B1+%28cxcl12%29/bio_rxiv__482596-160-8-14?v=Thermo+Fisher
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    recombinant human cxcl12 (sdf1 α - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    PeproTech cxcl12/sdf1-α
    CRISPR-Cas9 mediated knock-in at the CXCR4 C-terminus results in endogenously labelled protein which localises to the membrane and endosomes. (A) Staining of CXCR4 with KO validated and Fusin antibodies results in poor labelling of the receptor protein, while mEGFP and HaloTag knock-in cells demonstrate a membrane specific localisation. Interestingly mEos 4b CO clones demonstrate fluorescent aggregates, suggesting the fluorophore is cleaved. (B) mEGFP and HaloTag knock-in samples provide clonal populations which are evenly labelled and offer large samples for imaging experiments. (C) Measurement of total CXCR4 expression in wild type versus CRISPR edited cells through qRT-PCR. Compared to wild type, mEGFP knock-ins demonstrate an approximately 20-fold increase in expression (* p = 0.0384). Conversely, HaloTag knock-ins demonstrate a 50% reduction in expression (* p = 0.0301), while mEos 4b CO knock-in shows no change. (D) When RT PCR is performed using tag specific primers, the significant increase in mEGFP expression is likely due to the stability of mEGFP tagged CXCR4 RNA, suggesting that RNA stability is likely a factor in mediating the tag specific down-regulation observed. (E) <t>CXCL12-mediated</t> g protein activation measured by observing G protein dissociation/conformational changes by BRET in knock-in or wildtype cells transfected with cDNA encoding G α i1/Nluc and Venus/G γ 2. Results are expressed as % maximal <t>CXCL12</t> response observed in wildtype cells andshow a 3 fold increase in response in mEGFP knock-in clones compared to wild type, with a 50% reduction in response in HaloTag knock-in, and no variation in mEos 4b CO clones. (F) Potency of CXCL12-mediated g protein activation in cells expressing wildtype or gene-edited CXCR4.( n = 3 (S.D) for qRT-PCR data, compared by One-Way ANOVA with multiple comparisons. n = 5 for functional data.)
    Cxcl12/Sdf1 α, supplied by PeproTech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/sdf1-%CE%B1+%28cxcl12%29/pmc06158313-56-25-26?v=PeproTech
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    cxcl12/sdf1-α - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Millipore a human cxcl12/sdf1-α elisa kit
    CRISPR-Cas9 mediated knock-in at the CXCR4 C-terminus results in endogenously labelled protein which localises to the membrane and endosomes. (A) Staining of CXCR4 with KO validated and Fusin antibodies results in poor labelling of the receptor protein, while mEGFP and HaloTag knock-in cells demonstrate a membrane specific localisation. Interestingly mEos 4b CO clones demonstrate fluorescent aggregates, suggesting the fluorophore is cleaved. (B) mEGFP and HaloTag knock-in samples provide clonal populations which are evenly labelled and offer large samples for imaging experiments. (C) Measurement of total CXCR4 expression in wild type versus CRISPR edited cells through qRT-PCR. Compared to wild type, mEGFP knock-ins demonstrate an approximately 20-fold increase in expression (* p = 0.0384). Conversely, HaloTag knock-ins demonstrate a 50% reduction in expression (* p = 0.0301), while mEos 4b CO knock-in shows no change. (D) When RT PCR is performed using tag specific primers, the significant increase in mEGFP expression is likely due to the stability of mEGFP tagged CXCR4 RNA, suggesting that RNA stability is likely a factor in mediating the tag specific down-regulation observed. (E) <t>CXCL12-mediated</t> g protein activation measured by observing G protein dissociation/conformational changes by BRET in knock-in or wildtype cells transfected with cDNA encoding G α i1/Nluc and Venus/G γ 2. Results are expressed as % maximal <t>CXCL12</t> response observed in wildtype cells andshow a 3 fold increase in response in mEGFP knock-in clones compared to wild type, with a 50% reduction in response in HaloTag knock-in, and no variation in mEos 4b CO clones. (F) Potency of CXCL12-mediated g protein activation in cells expressing wildtype or gene-edited CXCR4.( n = 3 (S.D) for qRT-PCR data, compared by One-Way ANOVA with multiple comparisons. n = 5 for functional data.)
    A Human Cxcl12/Sdf1 α Elisa Kit, supplied by Millipore, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/sdf1-%CE%B1+%28cxcl12%29/pm29596520-129-1-8?v=Millipore
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    a human cxcl12/sdf1-α elisa kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    R&D Systems human sdf1 α
    CRISPR-Cas9 mediated knock-in at the CXCR4 C-terminus results in endogenously labelled protein which localises to the membrane and endosomes. (A) Staining of CXCR4 with KO validated and Fusin antibodies results in poor labelling of the receptor protein, while mEGFP and HaloTag knock-in cells demonstrate a membrane specific localisation. Interestingly mEos 4b CO clones demonstrate fluorescent aggregates, suggesting the fluorophore is cleaved. (B) mEGFP and HaloTag knock-in samples provide clonal populations which are evenly labelled and offer large samples for imaging experiments. (C) Measurement of total CXCR4 expression in wild type versus CRISPR edited cells through qRT-PCR. Compared to wild type, mEGFP knock-ins demonstrate an approximately 20-fold increase in expression (* p = 0.0384). Conversely, HaloTag knock-ins demonstrate a 50% reduction in expression (* p = 0.0301), while mEos 4b CO knock-in shows no change. (D) When RT PCR is performed using tag specific primers, the significant increase in mEGFP expression is likely due to the stability of mEGFP tagged CXCR4 RNA, suggesting that RNA stability is likely a factor in mediating the tag specific down-regulation observed. (E) <t>CXCL12-mediated</t> g protein activation measured by observing G protein dissociation/conformational changes by BRET in knock-in or wildtype cells transfected with cDNA encoding G α i1/Nluc and Venus/G γ 2. Results are expressed as % maximal <t>CXCL12</t> response observed in wildtype cells andshow a 3 fold increase in response in mEGFP knock-in clones compared to wild type, with a 50% reduction in response in HaloTag knock-in, and no variation in mEos 4b CO clones. (F) Potency of CXCL12-mediated g protein activation in cells expressing wildtype or gene-edited CXCR4.( n = 3 (S.D) for qRT-PCR data, compared by One-Way ANOVA with multiple comparisons. n = 5 for functional data.)
    Human Sdf1 α, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/sdf1-%CE%B1+%28cxcl12%29/pmc05062559-135-0-4?v=R%26D+Systems
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    human sdf1 α - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    CRISPR-Cas9 mediated knock-in at the CXCR4 C-terminus results in endogenously labelled protein which localises to the membrane and endosomes. (A) Staining of CXCR4 with KO validated and Fusin antibodies results in poor labelling of the receptor protein, while mEGFP and HaloTag knock-in cells demonstrate a membrane specific localisation. Interestingly mEos 4b CO clones demonstrate fluorescent aggregates, suggesting the fluorophore is cleaved. (B) mEGFP and HaloTag knock-in samples provide clonal populations which are evenly labelled and offer large samples for imaging experiments. (C) Measurement of total CXCR4 expression in wild type versus CRISPR edited cells through qRT-PCR. Compared to wild type, mEGFP knock-ins demonstrate an approximately 20-fold increase in expression (* p = 0.0384). Conversely, HaloTag knock-ins demonstrate a 50% reduction in expression (* p = 0.0301), while mEos 4b CO knock-in shows no change. (D) When RT PCR is performed using tag specific primers, the significant increase in mEGFP expression is likely due to the stability of mEGFP tagged CXCR4 RNA, suggesting that RNA stability is likely a factor in mediating the tag specific down-regulation observed. (E) CXCL12-mediated g protein activation measured by observing G protein dissociation/conformational changes by BRET in knock-in or wildtype cells transfected with cDNA encoding G α i1/Nluc and Venus/G γ 2. Results are expressed as % maximal CXCL12 response observed in wildtype cells andshow a 3 fold increase in response in mEGFP knock-in clones compared to wild type, with a 50% reduction in response in HaloTag knock-in, and no variation in mEos 4b CO clones. (F) Potency of CXCL12-mediated g protein activation in cells expressing wildtype or gene-edited CXCR4.( n = 3 (S.D) for qRT-PCR data, compared by One-Way ANOVA with multiple comparisons. n = 5 for functional data.)

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: Optimised CRISPR-Cas9 mediated single molecule imaging for accurate quantification through endogenous expression

    doi: 10.1101/482596

    Figure Lengend Snippet: CRISPR-Cas9 mediated knock-in at the CXCR4 C-terminus results in endogenously labelled protein which localises to the membrane and endosomes. (A) Staining of CXCR4 with KO validated and Fusin antibodies results in poor labelling of the receptor protein, while mEGFP and HaloTag knock-in cells demonstrate a membrane specific localisation. Interestingly mEos 4b CO clones demonstrate fluorescent aggregates, suggesting the fluorophore is cleaved. (B) mEGFP and HaloTag knock-in samples provide clonal populations which are evenly labelled and offer large samples for imaging experiments. (C) Measurement of total CXCR4 expression in wild type versus CRISPR edited cells through qRT-PCR. Compared to wild type, mEGFP knock-ins demonstrate an approximately 20-fold increase in expression (* p = 0.0384). Conversely, HaloTag knock-ins demonstrate a 50% reduction in expression (* p = 0.0301), while mEos 4b CO knock-in shows no change. (D) When RT PCR is performed using tag specific primers, the significant increase in mEGFP expression is likely due to the stability of mEGFP tagged CXCR4 RNA, suggesting that RNA stability is likely a factor in mediating the tag specific down-regulation observed. (E) CXCL12-mediated g protein activation measured by observing G protein dissociation/conformational changes by BRET in knock-in or wildtype cells transfected with cDNA encoding G α i1/Nluc and Venus/G γ 2. Results are expressed as % maximal CXCL12 response observed in wildtype cells andshow a 3 fold increase in response in mEGFP knock-in clones compared to wild type, with a 50% reduction in response in HaloTag knock-in, and no variation in mEos 4b CO clones. (F) Potency of CXCL12-mediated g protein activation in cells expressing wildtype or gene-edited CXCR4.( n = 3 (S.D) for qRT-PCR data, compared by One-Way ANOVA with multiple comparisons. n = 5 for functional data.)

    Article Snippet: For CXCL12 treated samples 100ng (10 μ M) recombinant human CXCL12 (SDF1 α , Thermo) was added for 4 minutes prior to fixation.

    Techniques: CRISPR, Knock-In, Staining, Clone Assay, Imaging, Expressing, Quantitative RT-PCR, Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction, Activation Assay, Transfection, Functional Assay

    CRISPR Knock-In CXCR4 clones allow for accurate single molecule cluster analysis compared to transfected cells. (A) Single molecule imaging of HaloTag CXCR4 Knock-Ins allows for effective single molecule localisation microscopy through labelling with Janelia Fluor 549, and subsequent cluster analysis using persistence based clustering. (B) CXCR4 knock-in and Hek293T transfected with a CXCR4-HaloTag were subject to single molecule imaging and cluster analysis after treatment with CXCL12 (10 μ M). CRISPR knock-ins demonstrate a significant increase in median cluster area on ligand treatment (* p = 0.0272), while transfected cells show no significant change.(C) Histograms showing percentage of clusters across a range of areas show that while a substantial shift towards larger cluster sizes is evident in CRISPR knock-ins, this is reduced in transfected cells. (D) The percentage of clusters below 50nm in radius is significantly reduced in CRISPR cells (* p = 0.0384) upon treatment with CXCL12 (upper panel), with a parallel increase in the percentage of clusters of larger sizes consistent with endocytic trafficking observed (* p = 0.0133) (lower panel). Conversely, no significant change in either collection of cluster sizes is evident in transfected cells. ( n = 3, S.E.M). paired t-test.)

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: Optimised CRISPR-Cas9 mediated single molecule imaging for accurate quantification through endogenous expression

    doi: 10.1101/482596

    Figure Lengend Snippet: CRISPR Knock-In CXCR4 clones allow for accurate single molecule cluster analysis compared to transfected cells. (A) Single molecule imaging of HaloTag CXCR4 Knock-Ins allows for effective single molecule localisation microscopy through labelling with Janelia Fluor 549, and subsequent cluster analysis using persistence based clustering. (B) CXCR4 knock-in and Hek293T transfected with a CXCR4-HaloTag were subject to single molecule imaging and cluster analysis after treatment with CXCL12 (10 μ M). CRISPR knock-ins demonstrate a significant increase in median cluster area on ligand treatment (* p = 0.0272), while transfected cells show no significant change.(C) Histograms showing percentage of clusters across a range of areas show that while a substantial shift towards larger cluster sizes is evident in CRISPR knock-ins, this is reduced in transfected cells. (D) The percentage of clusters below 50nm in radius is significantly reduced in CRISPR cells (* p = 0.0384) upon treatment with CXCL12 (upper panel), with a parallel increase in the percentage of clusters of larger sizes consistent with endocytic trafficking observed (* p = 0.0133) (lower panel). Conversely, no significant change in either collection of cluster sizes is evident in transfected cells. ( n = 3, S.E.M). paired t-test.)

    Article Snippet: For CXCL12 treated samples 100ng (10 μ M) recombinant human CXCL12 (SDF1 α , Thermo) was added for 4 minutes prior to fixation.

    Techniques: CRISPR, Knock-In, Clone Assay, Transfection, Imaging, Microscopy